PRINTING
FORGE_SLICER v4.2
LAYER
847 / 2,204
REMAINING
11h 42m
MATERIAL
PA12-CF
TEMP (NOZZLE)
285°C
BED TEMP
110°C
AEROSPACE BRACKET_A7
Nylon PA12-CF · 0.1mm layers
DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY
± 0.05mm
Industrial Additive Manufacturing

From CAD toProduction Part.No Tooling.No Minimum.

47% faster time-to-part than traditional manufacturing — aerospace brackets, surgical guides, and production jigs, layer by layer.

47%
faster time-to-part
72h
prototype to production
0
tooling required
ISO 9001:2015
AS9100D
FDA 21 CFR
COST ANALYSIS // REPORT_01

The Crossover Point Is Earlier
Than Your CFO Thinks.

Input your batch size. See where additive manufacturing beats injection molding on total cost-per-part — including tooling amortization.

COST-PER-PART CURVE
Additive
Injection
10
50
100
500
1k
5k
10k
COST / PART ($)
Crossover at ~1,200 units — additive wins below this threshold
YOUR BATCH SIZE500 units
1 unit10,000 units
ADDITIVE (FORGE)
$28
per unit · no tooling
WINNER
INJECTION MOLD
$61
per unit · incl. tooling
YOUR SAVINGS WITH FORGE
$33/unit(54% less)
TOTAL SAVED
$16,500
MATERIAL SCIENCE // REPORT_02

ASTM-Tested. Field-Proven.
Not Marketing Copy.

Real tensile strength, heat deflection, and surface finish numbers from certified third-party labs — compared to standard injection-molded ABS.

Tensile Strength
FORGE (Nylon PA12-CF)187 MPa
ABS Injection Mold (ref.)65 MPa
Heat Deflection
FORGE (Nylon PA12-CF)183 °C
ABS Injection Mold (ref.)75 °C
Surface Ra
FORGE (Nylon PA12-CF)3.2 μm
ABS Injection Mold (ref.)0.8 μm
Nylon PA12-CF
ASTM D638 / D648

Carbon-fiber reinforced. 40% lighter than aluminum at comparable stiffness.

VALIDATED APPLICATIONS
Aerospace brackets
Jigs & fixtures
End-use structural
DENSITY
1.09
g/cm³
SURFACE Ra
3.2
μm avg
TIME-TO-PART // REPORT_03

12 Weeks Compressed Into 72 Hours.

Every hour your prototype sits in a tooling queue is an hour your competitor is iterating. The comparison is not subtle.

TRADITIONAL TOOLING
12 Weeks
TOOLING COST
$28,000+
FORGE ADDITIVE
72 Hours
TOOLING COST
$0
TRADITIONAL MANUFACTURING CYCLE
W1-2
Design Finalization
Engineering reviews, DFM analysis
W3-4
Tooling Quote & PO
Vendor RFQ, approval cycles
W5-8
Mold Fabrication
4-week machining lead time
W9-10
T1 Sample Review
First article inspection, revisions
W11-12
Production Release
Final approval, production start
FORGE ADDITIVE CYCLE
H0
Upload CAD File
STEP / STL / 3MF accepted
H1
Instant DFM Check
AI-powered geometry analysis
H4
Print Initiated
Slicer optimized, bed loaded
H48
Post-Processing
Support removal, surface finish
H72
Parts Shipped
QC report included
96×
Faster to first part
$28k
Tooling cost eliminated
0
Design iterations blocked
100%
DFM report on upload
FREE ANALYSIS // START NOW

Start Your Free Build Analysis.

Upload your CAD file. Get an instant cost-per-part estimate and build-time projection — before you talk to anyone.

1
2
3
Drop your CAD file here
STEP · STL · 3MF · OBJ
Files encrypted at rest · Never shared · Deleted after 30 days
INDUSTRY REPORT · 2024

Additive Manufacturing
Benchmark Report

PDF
Cost-per-part analysis across 14 industries
ASTM material test results (47 materials)
Lead time benchmarks: additive vs. traditional
ROI calculator for volume thresholds
2025 technology roadmap
SOC 2 Type II
Certified
ISO 9001
:2015
4.9 / 5.0
G2 Rating
247 parts currently printing across 14 active builds · Next available slot: 4 hours